中文摘要

近年来，围绕湖滨区的一系列的造城圈地运动逐步展开。紧邻城市的湖滨区成为了转型期社会各阶层矛盾集中爆发的空间载体。在城市化和生态建设的背景下，滇池湖滨区征地矛盾频频发生，空间正义问题也更突出。而当前国内外关于空间正义的研究主要集中于资源配置方面，关于利益主体感知视角的正义问题研究比较缺乏。

本文采用遥感影像判图、GIS、问卷调查、SPSS和AMOS分析的方法，针对滇池湖滨区的空间生产特征、空间生产不正义的现象进行总结。应用空间正义的理论，总结得出空间正义感知指标体系。结合滇池湖滨区的特点，进一步建立滇池湖滨区空间正义感知体系。分别针对征地背景和生态建设背景，作出两类对比，即原住民对内的两两比较和原住民与市民之间比较，运用SPSS进行均值的独立样本τ检验。在运用AMOS软件建立空间正义感知结构方程模型的基础上，进行四类主体的群组分析，比对回归系数。以此归纳出原住民与市民感知的异同性规律，进一步揭示背后的原因。研究结论如下：

（1）滇池湖滨区空间生产的特征：①建设用地特征由乡村空间自由蔓延式转变为房地产为主导；房地产、旅游用地向湿地扩张；②湖滨边缘区生地变成熟地，土地增值潜力巨大。滇池湖滨区的空间生产的不正义现象突出。一方面，在湖滨区轰轰烈烈的圈地运动下的空间主体被置换，新的圈层结构产生，空间隔离趋向明显；另一方面，湖滨区入滇河道岸线出现部分私有化。

（2）空间正义感知的指标体系可以通过意图正义、过程正义和结果正义三个维度进行测度。并且，市民和原住民对于滇池湖滨区空间正义感知的差异性体现在三个方面：①原住民之间的被剥夺感，从强到弱依次为旅游搬迁原住民＞地产搬迁原住民＞生态搬迁原住民；②市民比原住民更加认同意图正义；③原住民比市民更加忽视过程正义和结果正义。另外，市民和原住民一致性体现在两个方面，①不同类型原住民对于空间正义感知维度重要性判断基本一致；②市民与原住民都不认同结果正义维度自身经济效应的实现。

（3）探究空间正义感知异同背后的原因，集中在以下三个方面：①公众公平享有湖滨公共资源的权利存在剥夺风险；②空间生产主体之间经济利益分享机制不足；③市民社会下原住民正义价值的消解。

本文立足于居民感知视角对空间正义进行批判，拓展了空间正义问题新的研究思路。为解决城市型湖滨区空间生产利益失衡问题提供依据，对公平正义的开发提供指导。

Abstract

During recent years, a series of city building and enclosuremovement centering on the lakeside have been gradually unfolded. Lakeside adjacentto the city has become the spatial carrier where contradictions from all sectorsbreak out in the transformation period. Under the background of urbanization andecological construction, contradictions of land expropriation in Dianchi lakesidehave frequently occurred. The problem of spatial justice has also become more prominent.However, researches on the spatial justice both at home and abroad are mainly concentratedin the aspect of resource allocation. Researches on the justice from the perceptionof interest subject are quite scare.

Adopting the way of remote-sensing image, GIS, questionnaireinvestigation, SPSS and AMOS, this paper makes a summary targeted at the spatialproduction characteristics and injustice of Dianchi lakeside. By applying the theoryof spatial justice, this paper summarizes the indicator system of spatial justiceperception. Combined with the characteristics of Dianchi lakeside, it fatherly setsup the spatial justice perception system of Dianchi lakeside. Targeted at the landexpropriation background and ecological construction respectively, this paper makestwo groups of comparisons, comparison between aborigines, comparison between aborigineand citizen. It applies SPSS to carry out independent sample T test of mean value.On the basis of constructing spatial justice perception model by AMOS, it makesthe group analysis of four subjects and compares the regression coefficient. Itsummarizes the similarities and differences between aborigine and citizen, furtherto expose the reasons. The research conclusions are as follows:

(1) Characteristicsof spatial production of Dianchi lakeside: ① Characteristics of land expropriation transform from the rural spaceto urban and rural type. ② Raw lands along the lakeside change into cultivated land, which hashuge value-added potential. Injustice of spatial production in Dianchi lakesideis quite prominent. On one hand, aborigines under the background of enclosure movementare rejected; on the other hand, occupation of public resources in lakeside is unfair.

(2) Indicator systemof spatial justice perception can be tested from three dimensions, respectivelyare intention justice, process justice and result justice. Moreover, differencesof citizens’ and aborigines’ perception of spatial justice in Dianchi lakeside areembodied in two aspects: ① There are great differences of the intention justice perception betweenaborigine and citizen; ② Aborigines more neglect the process justice and result justice thanthe citizens. Besides, both citizen and aborigine perceive that economic effectsare quite unfair.

(3) To explore thereasons behind similarities and differences, it is mainly concentrated in threeaspects: ① Aborigines and citizens are deprived of the use value; ② Justice value of aborigines is dispelled in the society of citizens;③ Participation right of aborigines has been ignored for a long time.Fromthe perspective of citizen perception, this paper judges the spatial justice andextends the new research thought of spatial justice, which offers basis for theunbalanced spatial production benefits of urban lakeside and offers right guidancefor the development of fairness and justice.

中文摘要

近年来，围绕湖滨区的一系列的造城圈地运动逐步展开。紧邻城市的湖滨区成为了转型期社会各阶层矛盾集中爆发的空间载体。在城市化和生态建设的背景下，滇池湖滨区征地矛盾频频发生，空间正义问题也更突出。而当前国内外关于空间正义的研究主要集中于资源配置方面，关于利益主体感知视角的正义问题研究比较缺乏。

本文采用遥感影像判图、GIS、问卷调查、SPSS和AMOS分析的方法，针对滇池湖滨区的空间生产特征、空间生产不正义的现象进行总结。应用空间正义的理论，总结得出空间正义感知指标体系。结合滇池湖滨区的特点，进一步建立滇池湖滨区空间正义感知体系。分别针对征地背景和生态建设背景，作出两类对比，即原住民对内的两两比较和原住民与市民之间比较，运用SPSS进行均值的独立样本τ检验。在运用AMOS软件建立空间正义感知结构方程模型的基础上，进行四类主体的群组分析，比对回归系数。以此归纳出原住民与市民感知的异同性规律，进一步揭示背后的原因。研究结论如下：

（1）滇池湖滨区空间生产的特征：①建设用地特征由乡村空间自由蔓延式转变为房地产为主导；房地产、旅游用地向湿地扩张；②湖滨边缘区生地变成熟地，土地增值潜力巨大。滇池湖滨区的空间生产的不正义现象突出。一方面，在湖滨区轰轰烈烈的圈地运动下的空间主体被置换，新的圈层结构产生，空间隔离趋向明显；另一方面，湖滨区入滇河道岸线出现部分私有化。

（2）空间正义感知的指标体系可以通过意图正义、过程正义和结果正义三个维度进行测度。并且，市民和原住民对于滇池湖滨区空间正义感知的差异性体现在三个方面：①原住民之间的被剥夺感，从强到弱依次为旅游搬迁原住民＞地产搬迁原住民＞生态搬迁原住民；②市民比原住民更加认同意图正义；③原住民比市民更加忽视过程正义和结果正义。另外，市民和原住民一致性体现在两个方面，①不同类型原住民对于空间正义感知维度重要性判断基本一致；②市民与原住民都不认同结果正义维度自身经济效应的实现。

（3）探究空间正义感知异同背后的原因，集中在以下三个方面：①公众公平享有湖滨公共资源的权利存在剥夺风险；②空间生产主体之间经济利益分享机制不足；③市民社会下原住民正义价值的消解。

本文立足于居民感知视角对空间正义进行批判，拓展了空间正义问题新的研究思路。为解决城市型湖滨区空间生产利益失衡问题提供依据，对公平正义的开发提供指导。

Abstract

During recent years, a series of city building and enclosuremovement centering on the lakeside have been gradually unfolded. Lakeside adjacentto the city has become the spatial carrier where contradictions from all sectorsbreak out in the transformation period. Under the background of urbanization andecological construction, contradictions of land expropriation in Dianchi lakesidehave frequently occurred. The problem of spatial justice has also become more prominent.However, researches on the spatial justice both at home and abroad are mainly concentratedin the aspect of resource allocation. Researches on the justice from the perceptionof interest subject are quite scare.

Adopting the way of remote-sensing image, GIS, questionnaireinvestigation, SPSS and AMOS, this paper makes a summary targeted at the spatialproduction characteristics and injustice of Dianchi lakeside. By applying the theoryof spatial justice, this paper summarizes the indicator system of spatial justiceperception. Combined with the characteristics of Dianchi lakeside, it fatherly setsup the spatial justice perception system of Dianchi lakeside. Targeted at the landexpropriation background and ecological construction respectively, this paper makestwo groups of comparisons, comparison between aborigines, comparison between aborigineand citizen. It applies SPSS to carry out independent sample T test of mean value.On the basis of constructing spatial justice perception model by AMOS, it makesthe group analysis of four subjects and compares the regression coefficient. Itsummarizes the similarities and differences between aborigine and citizen, furtherto expose the reasons. The research conclusions are as follows:

(1) Characteristicsof spatial production of Dianchi lakeside: ① Characteristics of land expropriation transform from the rural spaceto urban and rural type. ② Raw lands along the lakeside change into cultivated land, which hashuge value-added potential. Injustice of spatial production in Dianchi lakesideis quite prominent. On one hand, aborigines under the background of enclosure movementare rejected; on the other hand, occupation of public resources in lakeside is unfair.

(2) Indicator systemof spatial justice perception can be tested from three dimensions, respectivelyare intention justice, process justice and result justice. Moreover, differencesof citizens’ and aborigines’ perception of spatial justice in Dianchi lakeside areembodied in two aspects: ① There are great differences of the intention justice perception betweenaborigine and citizen; ② Aborigines more neglect the process justice and result justice thanthe citizens. Besides, both citizen and aborigine perceive that economic effectsare quite unfair.

(3) To explore thereasons behind similarities and differences, it is mainly concentrated in threeaspects: ① Aborigines and citizens are deprived of the use value; ② Justice value of aborigines is dispelled in the society of citizens;③ Participation right of aborigines has been ignored for a long time.Fromthe perspective of citizen perception, this paper judges the spatial justice andextends the new research thought of spatial justice, which offers basis for theunbalanced spatial production benefits of urban lakeside and offers right guidancefor the development of fairness and justice.